|

Meltdown in France; No more credibility
International Herald Tribune
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2005
Contrary to your reports and editorials ("Riots in Paris," Nov. 04), the
social unrest in France fails to taint the French model of integration.
Despite inequalities and severe unemployment traceable to the free-trade
"reforms" force-fed to France by America (and often defended by your
newspaper), France still succeeds in assimilating immigrants and in
secularizing Islam.
North Africans are now entering the French middle class. Many are
intermarrying. Very few Muslim adolescent girls defied the law against
conspicuous religious attire in French public schools. France makes
immigrants French.
By contrast, America fails to assimilate Arabs and many Hispanics, and the
American melting pot seldom melts blacks. Racial intermarriage is rare.
Affirmative action barely dents the misery of American ghettos, which remain
more desperate, doped-up, crime-ridden and permanent than any in France.
Daniel Birnbaum, Paris
As real time news and video now spreads around the world in a fraction of a
second, the illusion of the French model that successive French governments
since the end of World War II have tried to project slowly begins to
disappear.
The problems of France's suburbs have been ignored for over 30 years as have
been a plethora of other issues and reforms.
Richard Schatz, Paris
It's no surprise that France is being torn to shreds by its immigrant
population. France's corridors of power make up the world's largest
all-white boys club.
Johnna Bunn, Philadelphia
The riots in the suburbs of Paris may have been triggered by a single event,
but the magnitude shows that there are deep roots. Those parts of Paris -
and numerous other parts of other cities and towns in Western Europe - could
be described as barrels of dynamite ready to explode.
An increasing number of people have been excluded from society. The vast
unemployment has struck immigrants especially hard. In many poor suburbs,
the majority lives off low contributions from the state.
France is one of the strongest defenders of the so-called European social
model. The main feature of the model is a big state - with high taxes, a
regulated labor market, public welfare monopolies and large social security
systems. But after the events in Paris, isn't it about time that France
realizes this is a model that it should leave behind?
A regulated labor market creates unemployment. Those without jobs feel a
great insecurity, but so do those with jobs; they know that should they lose
work they wouldn't find more. The young people in Western Europe can't find
jobs and lose hope for the future.
High taxes reduce opportunities and put a brake on growth. Economic activity
is low and living standards across the population stagnate, and in several
places, deteriorate.
The antisocial effects of the social model strike even harder for
immigrants. Regulated housing markets produce ghetto-like suburbs. Since
hiring always involves a risk for the employer, a regulated and unionized
labor market excludes immigrants. They are deprived of their opportunities
to compete.
With low taxes, a free labor market and fewer regulations for companies, the
situation could change. France could have new jobs and increased prosperity.
And the country could give immigrants the chance to get into society and
work.
If we don't focus on change in order to disarm this bomb, which is ticking
all over Western Europe, we will see the Paris of today repeated elsewhere.
Johnny Munkhammar, Stockholm
No more credibility
The headline of Roger Cohen's column "Iran's behavior offers test for
world's mettle," (Globalist, Nov. 5) could just as well have referred to
President George W. Bush.
The Bush administration has forgiven Pakistan for its export of nuclear
technology to North Korea and Iran; ignored India's snubbing of the
nonproliferation treaty, dispensed with the antiballistic missile treaty and
is going soft on the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.
To really test the world's mettle, earlier this year the United States
insisted on eliminating language from a UN statement that would have
appealed to nuclear states to make moves toward disarmament. With his own
nuclear nonproliferation credentials in tatters, Bush will find it hard to
preach nuclear restraint to others - a strategic failure of potentially
grave consequence.
James Stuart, Le Paradou, France
|